Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoen, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Suppa, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Examination of Two Prompt Fading Procedures and Opportunities to Observe in Teaching Handicapped Preschoolers Self-Help Skills

Sharon F. Schoen

Department of Education at LaSalle University, Philadelphia

Francis E. Lentz, Jr

Department of School Psychology and Counseling at the University of Cincinnati

Robert J. Suppa

School District of the City of Allentown, PA

Utilizing four pairs of preschoolers with Down's Syndrome, the efficacy of two prompt fading procedures was compared during instruction of two self-help skills. In addition, the efficacy of observational learning was examined. Within a modified multiple baseline and multi-element design, one member of each pair received direct instruction on two skills. One skill was taught using a decreasing assistance prompting procedure, the other using a graduated guidance procedure. The other child was prompted to observe instruction, but not taught directly. Procedure and task were counter-balanced, the reliability of scoring and the social validity of outcomes were estimated, and the integrity of procedural implementation was examined. Results indicate that both procedures were effective in increasing the target behaviors. Surprisingly, children who only observed also acquired both tasks. Results generalized across assessors and were maintained across time. Implications for instructional planning for individuals who are mentally retarded are discussed.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 12, No. 4, 349-358 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/105381518801200408
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?