Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kilgo, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Examination of the Stability of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development with High-Risk Infants

Martha J. Cook

The University of Alabama

Loreta Holder-Brown

The University of Alabama

Lawrence J. Johnson

The University of Alabama

Jennifer L. Kilgo

Virginia Commonwealth University

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the test-retest reliability of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) (Bayley, 1969) with infants in a high-risk follow-up clinic. Eighty at-risk infants participated in this investigation. These infants were given the Mental and Motor Scales of the BSID at 6 and 12 months of age. Test-retest reliability scores of. 71 on the Mental Scale and. 69 on the Motor Scale were obtained.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 13, No. 1, 45-49 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/105381518901300106
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
J. A. Fleming, J. McCracken, and D. Carran
A Comparison of Two Methods of Determining Interrater Reliability
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2004; 29(2): 39 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]