Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JEPHSON, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Purposes, Importance, and Feasibility of Program Evaluation in Community-Based Early Intervention Programs

MELANIE BRITT JEPHSON

Stephen F. Austin State University Address correspondence to Melanie Jephson, Department of Counseling and Special Educational Programs, Stephan F. Austin State University, P.O. Box 13019, SFA Station, Nacogdoches, TX 75962-3019.

The purpose of this study was to gather information on service providers' perceptions related to program evaluation in community-based early intervention programs. The directors of 61 programs in Texas responded to a 22-item questionnaire. Respondents ranked eight program evaluation purposes, rated the importance and feasibility of five types of program evaluation on a Likert-type scale, and indicated on a checklist factors potentially hindering each type. Results indicated that program improvement should be the main reason for conducting program evaluation. Evaluating program goals and child progress were considered the most feasible strategies; evaluating program quality and evaluating family progress were perceived as most difficult. Although numerous factors hinder program evaluation efforts, a lack of appropriate methods and measurement instruments was perceived as the greatest constraint. Implications of these results for training and practice are discussed, and recommendations are made for future research.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 16, No. 3, 252-261 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/105381519201600305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?