Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McWILLIAM, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by WARE, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Reliability of Observations of Young Children's Engagement

An Application of Generalizability Theory

R. A. McWILLIAM

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

WILLIAM B. WARE

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

The reliability of measurement of how young children spend their time has traditionally been computed in terms of interobserver exact agreement This study sought to apply generalizability theory to the measurement of engagement Forty-seven young children, 15 of whom had disabilities, were observed four times in their child care setting. Types and levels of engagement were coded by three raters. Using ANOVA procedures for determining the relative contribution of different sources of error, a fully crossed (with subjects) two-facet (sessions, raters) generalizability (G) study was employed. The nine outcome measures were four types and five levels of engagement Results showed that raters accounted for less than 2% of the variance in the error of the scores, while sessions accounted for most of the variance other than between subject variance. The outcome measures proved to vary in their reliability robustness. The G study was followed by a decision (D) study to determine the levels of the facets that would be required to achieve a generalizability coefficient of .80. The number of sessions could be realistically increased to achieve this aim, but the increase in "dependability" achieved with the addition of each rater was minimal. Conclusions are drawn about the importance of assessing more than one source of error, raters, in observational research Overall, molecular methods were determined to be relatively unstable for measuring the molar construct of engagement, but certain engagement outcomes were stable across sessions and raters.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 18, No. 1, 34-47 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/105381519401800104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
N. Watt, A. Wetherby, and S. Shumway
Prelinguistic Predictors of Language Outcome at 3 Years of Age
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2006; 49(6): 1224 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
C. T. Bruckner, P. J. Yoder, and R.A. McWilliam
Generalizability and Decision Studies: An Example Using Conversational Language Samples
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2006; 28(2): 139 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
C. J. Dunst, M. B. Bruder, C. M. Trivette, D. Hamby, M. Raab, and M. McLean
Characteristics and Consequences of Everyday Natural Learning Opportunities
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 2001; 21(2): 68 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Focus Autism Other Dev DisablHome page
R. B. McCathren
Teacher-Implemented Prelinguistic Communication Intervention
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, January 1, 2000; 15(1): 21 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
R. B. McCathren, P. J. Yoder, and S. F. Warren
Testing Predictive Validity of the Communication Composite of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2000; 23(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
P. M. Brown, M. D. Remine, S. J. Prescott, and F. W. Rickards
Social Interactions of Preschoolers With and Without Impaired Hearing in Integrated Kindergarten
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2000; 23(3): 200 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
R. B. McCATHREN, P. J. YODER, and S. F. WARREN
Prelinguistic Pragmatic Functions as Predictors of Later Expressive Vocabulary
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1999; 22(3): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
P. J. YODER, S. F. WARREN, and L. HULL
Predicting Children's Response to Prelinguistic Communication Intervention
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1995; 19(1): 74 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
R. A. McWilliam and D. B. Bailey Jr.
Effects of Classroom Social Structure and Disability on Engagement
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1995; 15(2): 123 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]