|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Mothers' Perceptions of the Benefits and Drawbacks of Early Childhood Mainstreaming
Michael J. Guralnick
University of Washington
The possible benefits and drawbacks of early childhood mainstreaming were evaluated by mothers of both special-needs and non-special-needs children representing a large community-based sample. Separate groups were recruited to establish comparisons related to children with cognitive delays, communication disorders, physical disabilities, and those at risk. A sample of typically developing children was also included. Results revealed widespread support for the benefits of mainstreaming, particularly promoting the acceptance of children with disabilities in the community, preparing the child for the real world, encouraging learning to a greater extent, and providing opportunities for more interesting and creative activities. However, a substantial number of perceived drawbacks was also noted, especially in connection with the availability of special help, special services, and qualified personnel as well as concerns regarding rejection by peers. Findings related to drawbacks suggest parental views that might counteract perceived benefits and reduced confidence in mainstreamed programs. In general, mothers' perceptions of mainstreaming were similar across family demographics, child characteristics, and type of program placement. A major exception was children's behavior problems, in which mainstreaming was perceived to be associated with more drawbacks.
Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 18, No. 2,
168-183 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/105381519401800205
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. L. Pool, M. Macy, S. Bells McManus, and J. Noh
An Exploratory Investigation of Frequently Cited Articles From the Early Childhood Intervention Literature, 1994 to 2005
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
November 1, 2008;
28(3):
181 - 189.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Rafferty and K. W. Griffin
Benefits and Risks of Reverse Inclusion for Preschoolers with and without Disabilities: Perspectives of Parents and Providers
Journal of Early Intervention,
April 1, 2005;
27(3):
173 - 192.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. V. Chopra and N. K. French
Paraeducator Relationships with Parents of Students with Significant Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education,
August 1, 2004;
25(4):
240 - 251.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Lindsay and J. E. Dockrell
Whose Job Is It?: Parents' Concerns About the Needs of Their Children with Language Problems
Journal of Special Education,
February 1, 2004;
37(4):
225 - 235.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. C. Soodak, E. J. Erwin, P. Winton, M. J. Brotherson, A. P. Turnbull, M. J. Hanson, and L. M. J. Brault
Implementing Inclusive Early Childhood Education: A Call for Professional Empowerment
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 2002;
22(2):
91 - 102.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Rafferty, C. Boettcher, and K. W. Griffin
Benefits and Risks of Reverse Inclusion for Preschoolers With and Without Disabilities: Parents' Perspectives
Journal of Early Intervention,
October 1, 2001;
24(4):
266 - 286.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. BUYSSE, D. SKINNER, and S. GRANT
Toward a Definition of Quality Inclusion: Perspectives of Parents and Practitioners
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 2001;
24(2):
146 - 161.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Seery, P. M. Davis, and L. J. Johnson
Seeing Eye-to-Eye: Are Parents and Professionals in Agreement About the Benefits of Preschool Inclusion?
Remedial and Special Education,
September 1, 2000;
21(5):
268 - 319.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Wesley, V. Buysse, and L. Keyes
Comfort Zone Revisited: Child Characteristics and Professional Comfort with Consultation
Journal of Early Intervention,
April 1, 2000;
23(2):
106 - 115.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Garrick Duhaney and S. J. Salend
Parental Perceptions of Inclusive Educational Placements
Remedial and Special Education,
March 1, 2000;
21(2):
121 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Guralnick
Early Childhood Intervention: Evolution of a System
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,
January 1, 2000;
15(2):
68 - 79.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Odom
Preschool Inclusion: What We Know and Where We Go From Here
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 2000;
20(1):
20 - 27.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Grove and D. Fisher
Entrepreneurs of Meaning: Parents and the Process of Inclusive Education
Remedial and Special Education,
July 1, 1999;
20(4):
208 - 215.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. GURALNICK
The Nature and Meaning of Social Integration for Young Children With Mild Developmental Delays in Inclusive Settings
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 1999;
22(1):
70 - 86.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Fisher, I. Pumpian, and C. Sax
Parent and Caregiver Impressions of Different Educational Models
Remedial and Special Education,
May 1, 1998;
19(3):
173 - 180.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. Bruder and L. Staff
A Comparison of the Effects of Type of Classroom and Service Characteristics on Toddlers with Disabilities
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1998;
18(1):
26 - 37.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Wesley, V. Buysse, and S. Tyndall
Family and Professional Perspectives on Early Intervention: An Exploration Using Focus Groups
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1997;
17(4):
435 - 456.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. BUYSSE, P. WESLEY, L. KEYES, and D. B. BAILEY Jr.
Assessing the Comfort Zone of Child Care Teachers in Serving Young Children With Disabilities
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 1996;
20(3):
189 - 203.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
