Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'BRIEN, M.
Right arrow Articles by ROY, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Defining Eligibility Criteria for Preventive Early Intervention in an NICU Population

MARION O'BRIEN

MABEL RICE

CAROLYN ROY

The University of Kansas

Perinatal medical status, environmental risk, and infant developmental status in a group of high-risk infants cared for in an NICU immediately after birth were evaluated for their usefulness as possible criteria for entry into preventive early intervention services. Those children whose 4-year IQ scores placed them in the borderline or deficient category were considered to be the "target" group for whom early preventive intervention would have been indicated. Of the individual categories of risk, family environment was most accurate, 18-month developmental assessments were somewhat useful, and perinatal health histories were least effective in identifying the target children. The aggregation of all three categories of risk was the most accurate in identifying low performance at age 4, but would result in a high rate of under-referrals to early intervention services. A 2-tiered system of developmental follow-up, based on environmental risk criteria, is proposed.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 20, No. 4, 283-293 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/105381519602000401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
S. E. Rosenkoetter, K. T. Whaley, A. H. Hains, and L. Pierce
The Evolution of Transition Policy for Young Children with Special Needs and Their Families: Past, Present, and Future
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]