Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rafferty, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Benefits and Risks of Reverse Inclusion for Preschoolers With and Without Disabilities: Parents' Perspectives

Yvonne Rafferty

Pace University, YRafferty{at}Pace.edu

Caroline Boettcher

Pace University

Kenneth W. Griffin

Cornell University

In this article, we compare the perceived benefits and risks of inclusion among 244 parents whose preschoolers with and without disabilities attended a community-based reverse inclusion program. Parents reported strong support for inclusion and differed on only one attitude dimension. Perceived risks for typically developing children were greater among parents of typically developing children than among parents of children with disabilities. Level of support was consistent for parents of children with mild, moderate, and severe disabilities. Parents reported greater support for including children with mild-moderate disabilities, as well as those with speech or orthopedic impairments. Rates of program satisfaction and parent involvement were high and 94% indicated they would place their child in a similar program again.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 24, No. 4, 266-286 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/105381510102400403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
Y. Rafferty and K. W. Griffin
Benefits and Risks of Reverse Inclusion for Preschoolers with and without Disabilities: Perspectives of Parents and Providers
Journal of Early Intervention, April 1, 2005; 27(3): 173 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]