Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, P.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Examination of Quantitative Methods Used in Early Intervention Research: Linkages With Recommended Practices

Patricia Snyder

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, psnyde{at}lsuhsc.edu

Bruce Thompson

Texas A & M University

Mary E. Mclean

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Barbara J. Smith

University of Colorado-Denver

Findings are reported related to the research methods and statistical techniques used in the 450 group quantitative studies examined as part of the literature review portion of the Division for Early Childhood Recommended Practices project. Twelve trained coders used an investigator-developed coding form to analyze studies across seven major dimensions: (a) sampling procedures, (b) variable selection, (c) variable definition, (d) measurement integrity, (e) treatment fidelity, (f) statistical analyses, and (g) magnitude-of effect reporting. Results suggested that the methodological integrity of the quantitative research used to inform recommended practices was not uniformly convincing and compelling. Implications are offered related to the strength of empirical support for recommended practices and the conduct and reporting of future research.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 25, No. 2, 137-150 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/105381510202500211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?