This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Macy, M. G. Articles by Squires, J. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Validity and Reliability of a Curriculum-Based Assessment Approach to Determine Eligibility for Part C Services

University of Oregon, mmacy{at}uoregon.edu

Diane D. Bricker

University of Oregon

Jane K. Squires

University of Oregon

Traditional standardized, norm-referenced assessments are used most often to determine children's eligibility for specialized services. These traditional tests have at least two drawbacks: (a) test items and activities often do not reflect children's functional repertoires; and (b) outcomes are difficult to link directly to goal development, intervention, and evaluation. A promising alternative is the use of an assessment approach that reflects children's functional repertoires in familiar environments (i.e., authentic), and directly connects outcomes to programmatic efforts (i.e., linked). This study investigated the validity and reliability of an authentic and linked alternative assessment. Sixty-eight toddlers, with and without disabilities, were given traditional and alternative eligibility assessments. Results suggest the potential for using alternative assessment for determining eligibility for early intervention services.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1-16 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/105381510502800101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Keilty, D. J. LaRocco, and F. B. Casell Early Interventionists' Reports of Authentic Assessment Methods Through Focus Group Research Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, February 1, 2009; 28(4): 244 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bricker, J. Clifford, P. Yovanoff, K. Pretti-Frontczak, M. Waddell, D. Allen, and R. Hoselton Eligibility Determination Using a Curriculum-Based Assessment: A Further Examination Journal of Early Intervention, December 1, 2008; 31(1): 3 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Grisham-Brown, R. A. Hallam, and K. Pretti-Frontczak Preparing Head Start Personnel to Use a Curriculum-Based Assessment: An Innovative Practice in the "Age of Accountability" Journal of Early Intervention, September 1, 2008; 30(4): 271 - 281. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. VanDerHeyden, P. A. Snyder, C. Broussard, and K. Ramsdell Measuring Response to Early Literacy Intervention With Preschoolers at Risk Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, February 1, 2008; 27(4): 232 - 249. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Rous, K. McCormick, C. Gooden, and K. F. Townley Kentucky's Early Childhood Continuous Assessment and Accountability System: Local Decisions and State Supports Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 19 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]