Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Early Intervention
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mott, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dunst, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Use of Presumptive Eligibility for Enrolling Children in Part C Early Intervention

Donald W. Mott

J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center, dmott{at}charter.net

Carl J. Dunst

Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute and J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center

The extent to which presumptive eligibility was used to enroll children in early intervention was the focus of this study. Participants were 180 children enrolled in early intervention in western NC during a 2-year period. Presumptive eligibility was defined as the process of determining a child's eligibility for IDEA Part C early intervention based on information about the child and family available at the time of referral. Results showed that presumptive eligibility was used for only 18% of the children, but could have been used for an additional 66% of the children. Eligibility determination took more than 45 days for over 40% of the children; developmental evaluations were needed to determine eligibility for 24% of the children, but an additional 31% of the children received developmental evaluations not needed to determine eligibility; and 83% of delayed eligibility decisions were due to bureaucratic procedures or developmental evaluations not needed for eligibility determination. Findings are discussed in light of IDEA's emphasis on expediting early identification and enrollment of infants and toddlers in Part C programs.

Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 29, No. 1, 22-31 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/105381510602900102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?