|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Blueprint of a Cost Analysis Approach for Early Intervention: Application to a Home Visiting Program to Prevent Child Abuse and Neglect
Catherine Boulatoff
St. Lawrence University, Cboulatoff{at}stlawu.edu
Vonda K. Jump
Utah State University
In the current context of accountability, analysis of early intervention program costs can help decision makers allocate resources. This paper describes a cost analysis approach, known as the ingredient method, and demonstrates its applicability for evaluating the costs of a universal home visiting program designed to reduce child abuse and neglect. Results of the cost analysis showed the average cost was ,$4,970 per family per year (in 2005 dollars). This included, on average, 2 visits by the public health nurse and 29 home visits by paraprofessional family visitors. The cost of enrolling a new family in the program, consisting of 1 initial visit by the nurse followed by weekly visits by family visitors, was $7,835. Families with the most risk for abuse and neglect were more likely to take advantage of family visitor services and enroll in more intensive services. Implications for conducting similar cost analysis studies in early intervention using the ingredient method are discussed.
References
- Barnett, W.S. (1993). Economic evaluation of home visiting programs. The Future of Children, 3, 93-112.[CrossRef]
- Bricker, D., & Squires, J. (1999). Ages & stages questionnaires (ASQ): A parent-completed, child-monitoring system (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
- Caldwell, R.A. (1992). The costs of child abuse vs. child abuse prevention: Michigan's experience. East Lansing, MI: Michigan's Children's Trust Fund.
- Chambers, J.G., & Parrish, T.B. (1983). The development of a resource cost model funding base for education in Illinois. Springfield, IL: State Board of Education.
- Chan, B., & Taylor, N. (1998). The follow along program cost analysis in southwest Minnesota. Infants Young Children, 10, 71-79.
- Corso, P.S., & Lutzker, J.R. (2006). The need for economic analysis in research on child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 727-738.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Duggan, A.K., McFarlane, E.C., Fuddy, L., Burrell, L., Higman, S.M., Windham, A., & Sia, C. (2004). Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program: Impact in preventing child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 597-622.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Duggan, A.K., McFarlane, E.C., Windham, A.M., Rohde, C.A., Salkever, D.S., Fuddy, L., Rosenberg, L.A., Buchbinder, S.B., & Sia, C. (1999). Evaluation of Hawaii's healthy start program. The Future of Children, 9, 66-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Eliot, L., & Flanagan, K. (1999). Growing great kids and child development curriculum. Retrieved September 16, 2007, from http://www.Greatkidsinc.org.
- Escobar, C.M., Barnett, W.S., & Goetze, L.D. (1994). Cost analysis in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 18, 48-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fraser, J.A., Armstrong, K.L., Morris, J.P., & Dadds, M.R. (2000). Home visiting intervention for vulnerable families with newborns: Follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1399-1429.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Goetze, L.D., Akers, J., & Judd, D.R. (1998). Utah part C parent fee impact study. Final report submitted to the Utah Department of Education.
- Goetze, L.D., Broadhead Boulatoff, C., Jump, V.K., & Judd, D.R. (2001). A financial study of Ohio's statewide early intervention services. Early Intervention Research Institute, Utah State University, Logan.
- Gould, M.S., & O'Brien, T. (1995). Child maltreatment in Colorado: The value of prevention and the cost of failure to prevent. Denver, CO: Center for Human Investment Policy, University of Colorado at Denver.
- Guterman, N.B. (1999). Enrollment strategies in early home visitation to prevent physical child abuse and neglect and the "universal versus targeted"debate: a meta-analysis of population-based and screening-based programs. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 863-890.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hahn, R.A., Bilukha, O.O., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M.T., Liberman, A., Moscicki, E.K., Snyder, S., Tuma, F., Schofield, A., Corso, P.S., & Briss, P. (2003). First reports evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing violence: Early childhood home visitation. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, SR (RR-14), 1-20.
- Kamerman, S.B., & Kahn, A.J. (1993). Home health visiting in Europe. The Future of Children, 3, 39-52.[CrossRef]
- Karoly, L.A., Greenwood, P., Everingham, S., Hoube, J., Kilburn, M., Rydell, C., Sanders, M., & Chiesa, J. (1998). Investing in our children: What we know and don't know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
- Karoly, L.A., Kilburn, M.R., Bigelow, J.H., Caulkins, J.P., & Cannon, J.S. (2001). Assessing costs and benefits of early childhood intervention programs: Overview and application to the starting early starting smart program [with] executive summary. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
- Krugman, R.D. (1993). Universal home visiting: A recommendation from the U.S advisory board on child abuse and neglect. The Future of Children, 3, 184-191.
- Larner, M., Halpern, R. & Harkavy, O. (Eds.), Fair Start for children: Lessons learned from seven demonstration projects. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Laszewski, A. (n.d.). The early years home visitation outcomes project of Wisconsin. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.uwex.edu/ces/flp/homevisit/evaluation/pdfs/early_years.pdf.
- Levin, H.M. (1983). Cost-effectiveness: A primer. Beverly Hills: Sage.
- Levin, J., Perez, M., Lam, I., Chambers, J.G., & Hebbeler, K.M. (2004). National early intervention longitudinal study: Expenditure study. NEILS Data Report No. 4. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
- Olds, D.L., Henderson, C.R., Phelps, C., Kitzman, H., & Hanks, C. (1993). Effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on government spending. Medical Care, 31, 155-174.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- National Data on Child Abuse Neglect. (2004, June).Policy & Practice, 62(2), 6.
- Plotnick, R.D., & Deppman, L. (1999). Using benefit-cost analysis to assess child abuse prevention and intervention programs. Child Welfare, 78, 381-407.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Powell, D. (1993). Inside home visiting programs. The Future of Children, 3, 23-38.
- Saint Pierre, R.G., & Layzer, J.I. (1999). Using home visits for multiple purposes: The comprehensive child development program. The Future of Children, 11, 21-33.
- Schweinhart, L.J., Barnes, H.V., & Weikart, D.P. (1993). Significant benefits: The high/scope perry preschool study through age 27. Monograph of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 10. Ypsilanti, MI: High/ Scope Press.
- Tarr, J.E., & Barnett, W.S. (2001). A cost analysis of part C early intervention services in New Jersey. Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 45-54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- United Way of America (1996). Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach. Alexandria, VA: United Way.
- World Health Organization, Child abuse and neglect. Retrieved October 1, 2005, from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/neglect/en/
Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 30, No. 1,
73-84 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/105381510703000106

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|